 |
|
|
Click Here to Download Word Format File H. GUSTAV MUELLER, Ph.D. PERSONAL DATA: Address: 1284 Hitt Lane Date of Birth: December 20, 1947
PROFESSIONAL HONORS AND AWARDS PROFESSIONAL PRESENTATIONS State Meetings: Presented over 200 seminars and short courses at state audiology meetings. Served as keynote speaker at state audiology meetings for 46 different states. International Meetings: Invited keynote speaker for audiology meetings in Athens, Auckland, Buenos Aries, Bogota, Brisbane, Canberra, Kuala Lumpur, Halifax, Heidelberg, Hong Kong, Kingston, Manchester, Mexico City, Monte Carlo, Paris, Rome, San Juan, Sao Paulo, Seoul, Singapore, St. Lucia, Sydney, Taipei, Toronto, Vancouver, Victoria.
2. MUELLER, HG. Johnson, R. The effects of various front-to-back ratios on the performance of directional microphone hearing aids. Asha, 1976, 18,9: 679. (Abstract) 3. Grimes, A. MUELLER, HG. Examination of binaural amplification using sentence material. Asha, 1978, 20,9: 747. (Abstract) 4. MUELLER, HG. Grimes, A Pinelly, G. Clinical hearing aid differentiation: Effects of loudspeaker placement. Asha, 1978, 20,9: 766. (Abstract) 5. MUELLER, HG. Grimes, A. Jerome, J. PB and SSI performance intensity functions as predictors for binaural amplification. Asha, 1979, 21,9: 761. 6. MUELLER, HG. Grimes, A. Directional Hearing Aids: Profile for candidacy. Asha, 1980, 22,9: 708. (Abstract) 7. Schwartz, D. Surr, R. MUELLER, HG, Walden, B. Experience
with ear canal 8. Grimes, A. MUELLER, HG. Pikus, A. Clinical validation of performance-intensity functions. Asha, 1981, 23,10: 709. (Abstract) 9. MUELLER, HG. Directional versus omnidirectional amplification: Effects of binaural and high pass fittings. Asha, 1981, 23,10: 771. (Abstract) 10. Sedge, R. MUELLER, HG, Dillon, J. Dichotic digit and CV results for individuals with head injuries. Asha, 1982, 24,10: 728. (Abstract) 11. MUELLER, HG, Sedge, R. Salazar, A. SSW results in head injury: Preliminary report of 200 cases. Asha, 1982, 24,10: 728. (Abstract) 12. Pengelly, M. MUELLER, HG, Hill, B. MLDs: Effects of high frequency hearing loss and masking stimuli. Asha, 1982, 24,10: 845. (Abstract) 13. Grimes, A. MUELLER, HG. Clinical considerations in the use of time-compressed speech tests. Asha, 1982, 24, 10: 810. (Abstract) 14. MUELLER, HG. Sedge, R. Salazar, A. Head injury and auditory processing: Functional and physical correlates. Asha, 1983, 25,10: 134. (Abstract) 15. MUELLER, HG. Sedge, R. Salazar, A. Head injury and auditory processing: Sensitivity of three dichotic tests. Asha, 1983, 10: 134. (Abstract) 16. Beck, W. MUELLER, HG. Time compressed speech recognition of a brain injured population. Asha, 1983, 25,10: 165. (Abstract) 17. Surr, R. MUELLER, HG. Variability of dichotic scores in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Asha, 1983, 25,10: 165. (Abstract) 18. Sedge, R. MUELLER, HG. Beck, W. Salazar, A. Anatomical and functional sequelae of penetrating head injuries. Asha, 1983, 25, 10: 175. (Abstract) 19. Bender, D. MUELLER, HG. User satisfaction with post-auricular wireless CROS/BICROS amplification. Asha, 1983, 25,10: 137. (Abstract) 20. MUELLER, HG. Sedge, R. Beck, W. Dichotic CV double correct responses: Effects of brain injury. Asha, 1984, 25,10: 150. (Abstract) 21. Sedge, R. MUELLER, HG. Beck, W. Monotic CV performance in a brain damaged population. Asha, 1984, 26,10: 150. (Abstract) 22. Beck, W. MUELLER, HG. Sedge, R. SSW test reliability in a brain damaged population. Asha, 1984, 26,10: 150. (Abstract) 23. Bender, D. MUELLER, HG. Factors influencing the decision to obtain amplification. Asha, 1984, 26, 10: 120. (Abstract) 24. Wilson, L. MUELLER, HG. Performance of normal hearing individuals on Auditec filtered speech tests. Asha, 1984, 26, 10: 120. (Abstract) 25. Beck, W. MUELLER, HG. Sedge, R. Clinical experience with the dichotic sentence identification test. Asha, 1985, 27, 10: 158. (Abstract) 26. Chandler, D. MUELLER, HG. Multiple electrode recordings of ABR for high frequency hearing loss. Asha, 1985, 27, 10: 189. (Abstract) 27. MUELLER, HG. Grimes, A. The SSW: Practical use. Asha,
1985, 27, 10: 62. 28. Rogers, R. Beck, W. Smetana, W. MUELLER, HG. Attitudes concerning the use of hearing protection. Asha, 1986, 28, 10: 85. (Abstract) 29. Sarsfield, M. Chandler, D. MUELLER, HG.. Clinical application of the 40-HZ ERP in central pathology. Asha, 1986, 28, 10: 105. (Abstract) 30. Olsen, W. Palm, D. MUELLER, HG. Keith, R. Controversies in diagnostic audiology: Central auditory tests. Asha, 1986, 28, 10: 96. (Abstract) 31. Sedge, R. MUELLER, HG. Beck, W. Audiologic test results of the Vietnam Head Injury Study. Asha, 1986, 26,10: 158. (Abstract) 32. MUELLER, HG. Bender, D. Reasons for obtaining hearing aids: Do they relate to subsequent benefits? Corti’s Organ, 1987, 11, 2: 6. (Abstract) 33. Calkins, A. MUELLER, HG. Preference for ITE vs. BTE hearing aids: Influencing factors. Asha, 1987, 29, 10: 161. (Abstract) 34. MUELLER, HG. Reeder, P. Success with binaural amplification: Two contributing factors. Asha, 1987, 29, 10: 161. (Abstract) 35. MUELLER, HG. Calkins, A. Dichotic speech measures for predicting hearing aid benefit. Asha, 1988, 30, 10: 104. (Abstract) 36. Grimes, A. MUELLER, HG. Hearing aid distortion in the real ear. Asha, 1988, 30, 10: 150. (Abstract) 37. Calkins, A. MUELLER, HG. BTE vs. ITE: Do experienced users want to change style? Asha, 1988, 30, 10: 193. (Abstract) 38. Hood, L. MUELLER, HG. Central auditory testing--What does it tell us? Asha, 1989, 31, 10: 47. (Abstract) 39. MUELLER, HG. Jons, C. Some clinical guidelines for the fitting of custom hearing aids. Asha, 1989, 10: 57. (Abstract) 40. MUELLER, HG. Cuttie, V. Bryant, M. Predicting REIR: Do REUR and REOR measures help? Asha, 1989, 10: 117. (Abstract) 41. Bryant, M. MUELLER, HG. Jons, C. Establishing real ear insertion gain pass/fail criteria for ITE fittings. Audiology Today, 1990, 2, 2: 27. (Abstract) 42. MUELLER, HG. Bryant, M. Brown, W. Fitting hearing aids to patients with high frequency hearing loss. Asha, 1990, 10: 58. (Abstract) 43. Brown, W. MUELLER, HG. Webb, A. Do clinical speech intelligibility ratings predict success with hearing aids? Asha, 1990, 10: 114. (Abstract) 44. Clark, E. MUELLER, HG. Consumer ratings of programmable hearing aids. Audiology Today, 1991, 2: 28. (Abstract) 45. MUELLER, HG. Brown, W. Prospective elderly hearing aid users: Hearing loss, HHIE, and HAPI results. Asha, 1991, 10, 92. (Abstract) 46. MUELLER, HG. Bright, K. Study of occlusion effect using probe microphone measurements. Audiology Today, 1992, 4, 2: 47. (Abstract) 47. MUELLER, H. Roberto, K. Bottenberg, D. Richter, J. The elderly hearing impaired: Obstacles to hearing aid use. Audiology Today, 1992, 4, 2: 47. (Abstract) 48. MUELLER, HG. Bentler, R. Fabry, D. Hawkins, D. Metz, M. Hearing aid selection: Practical issues. Audiology Today, 1992, 4, 2: 30. (Abstract) 49. MUELLER, HG. Bray, V. Palmer, C. Danhauer, J. Valente, M. Killion was right...It’s easier to fit hearing aids on the KEMAR. Audiology Today, 1993, 5, 2. (Abstract)
51. MUELLER, HG. Sweetow, R. Clinical rationale for using an overhead speaker in the evaluation of hearing aids. Archives of Otolaryngology, 1978, 104: 417-418. 52. Grimes, A. MUELLER, HG. Sweetow, R. Monaural versus binaural amplification for severely hearing impaired children. Audiology and Hearing Education, 1979, 2: 21-24. 53. MUELLER, HG. Johnson, R. The effects if various front-to-back ratios on the performance of directional microphone hearing aids. Journal of the American Auditory Society, 1979, 5: 18-22. 54. MUELLER, HG. Schwartz, D. Surr, R. The use of the exponential acoustic horn in an open mold configuration. Hearing Instruments, 1981, 32, 10: 22-24. 55. MUELLER, HG. Directional microphone hearing aids: A 10 year report. Hearing Instruments, 1981, 32, 11: 16-19. 56. Bender, D. MUELLER, HG. Military noise induced hearing loss: Incidence and management. Military Medicine, 1981, 146: 434-437. 57. Grimes, A. MUELLER, HG. Malley, J. Examination of binaural amplification in children. Ear and Hearing, 1981, 2: 208-210. 58. MUELLER, HG. Grimes, A. Jerome, J. Performance-intensity functions as predictor for binaural amplification. Ear and Hearing, 1981, 2: 211-214. 59. Surr, R. Seidman, J. Schwartz, D. MUELLER, HG. Effects of audiometric configuration on speech-band thresholds in sensorineural hearing loss subjects. Ear and Hearing, 1982, 3: 246-250. 60. MUELLER, HG. Grimes, A. Erdman, S. Subjective ratings of directional amplification. Hearing Instruments, 1983, 34, 2: 14-16. 61. MUELLER, HG. Grimes, A. Speech audiometry for hearing aid selection. Seminars in Hearing, 1983, 4: 255-272. 62. Grimes, A. MUELLER, HG. Williams, D. Clinical considerations in the use of time-compressed speech. Ear and Hearing, 1984, 2: 77-81. 63. MUELLER, HG. Strategies and considerations in hearing aid selection. Hearing Instruments, 1984, 35, 11: 9. 64. MUELLER, HG. Hawkins, D. Sedge, R. Three important options in hearing aid selection. Hearing Instruments, 1984, 35, 11: 9. 65. Beck, W. MUELLER, HG. Sedge, R. Examination of the reliability of the SSW. SSW Reports, 1985, 7, 2: 3-5. 66. Surr, R. Montgomery, A. MUELLER, HG. The effect of amplification on tinnitus. Ear and Hearing, 1985, 6, 2: 73-77. 67. Hawkins, D. MUELLER, HG. Some variables affecting the accuracy of probe tube microphone measurements. Hearing Instruments, 1986, 37, 1: 18-22. 68. MUELLER, HG. Binaural: The remaining questions. The
Hearing Journal, 1986, 69. MUELLER, HG. Binaural amplification: Attitudinal factors. The Hearing Journal, 1986, 39, 11: 7-10. 70. Surr, R. Montgomery, A. MUELLER, HG. The effect of monaural hearing aid use on dichotic test results for individuals with high frequency hearing loss. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1986, 51, 2: 161-169. 71. MUELLER, HG. Sweetow, R. A clinical comparison of probe microphone systems. Hearing Instruments, 1987, 38, 6: 20-21. 72. MUELLER, HG. An auditory protocol for evaluation of neural trauma. Seminars in Hearing, 1987, 8, 3: 223-241. 73. MUELLER, HG. Beck, W. Brainstem level test results following head injury. Seminars in Hearing, 1987, 8, 3: 253-261. 74. Jabbari, B. MUELLER, HG. Howard, D. Auditory brainstem response findings in the late phase of head injury. Seminars in Hearing, 1987, 8, 3: 261-267. 75. MUELLER, HG. The staggered spondaic word test: Practical use. Seminars in Hearing, 1987, 8, 3: 267-279. 76. MUELLER, HG. Beck, W. Sedge, R. Comparison of the efficiency of cortical level speech tests. Seminars in Hearing, 1987, 8, 3: 279-299. 77. MUELLER, HG. Commentary on: Selecting binaural hearing aid candidates. The Hearing Journal, 1988, 41, 3: 20-26. 78. Hawkins, D. Montgomery, A. MUELLER, HG. Sedge, R. Assessment of speech intelligibility by hearing impaired listeners. Noise as a Public Health Problem (V.2), Berglund (Ed.), Stockholm: Swedish Council for Building Research. 1988, 241-246. 79. MUELLER, HG. Individualizing the ordering of custom hearing instruments. Hearing Instruments, 1989, 2: 18-22. 80. MUELLER, HG. Audiology in government agencies. Audiology Today, 1990, 2, 1: 26. 81. MUELLER, HG. Probe tube microphone measures: Some opinions on terminology and procedures. The Hearing Journal, 1990, 43, 1: 17-23. 82. McCarthy, P. Montgomery, A. MUELLER, HG. Decision making in rehabilitative audiology. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 1990, 1, 1: 23-30. 83. MUELLER, HG. Killion, MC. An easy method for calculating the articulation index. The Hearing Journal, 1990, 43, 9: 14-17. 84. MUELLER, HG. Budinger, AC. Selection of hearing aid style. Reports in Hearing Instrumentation and Technology, 1990, 2, 1: 5-10. 85. MUELLER, HG. Budinger, AC. Grimes, A. Insertion gain comparisons of ITE telecoils. Reports in Hearing Instrumentation and Technology, 1990, 2, 1: 11-15. 86. McDonnel,. D. Jabbari, B. Spinella, G. MUELLER, HG.
Delayed hearing loss after neurovascular decompression. Neurosurgery,
1990, 27, 997-1003. 88. MUELLER, HG. Bryant, M. Some overlooked uses of probe microphone measures. Seminars in Hearing, 1991, 12, 1: 73-92. 89. Bryant, M. MUELLER, HG. Northern, J. Long canal minimal contact ITE hearing aids. Hearing Instruments, 1991, 42, 1: 12-15. 90. Sweetow, R. MUELLER, HG. The interfacing of programmable hearing aids and probe microphone measures (Part 1). Audecibel, 1991, 40, 2: 11-13. 91. Sweetow, R. MUELLER, HG. The interfacing of programmable hearing aids and probe microphone measures (Part 2). Audecibel, 1991, 40, 3: 17-23. 92. Grimes, A. MUELLER, HG. Telecoils and assistive listening
devices: Assessment using probe microphone measures (Part 1). The Hearing
Journal, 1991, 44, 6. 94. Hawkins, D. Beck, L. Bratt, G. Fabry, D. MUELLER, HG. Stelmachowicz, P. The Vanderbilt/Department of Veterans Affairs 1990 Conference Consensus Statement: Recommended components of a hearing aid selection procedure for adults. Audiology Today, 1991, 3, 2: 16-18. 95. Hawkins, D. Beck, L. Bratt, G. Fabry, D. MUELLER, HG. Stelmachowicz, P. The Vanderbilt/Department of Veterans Affairs 1990 Conference Consensus Statement: Recommended components of a hearing aid selection procedure for adults. Asha, 1991, 33, 4: 37-38. 96. MUELLER, HG. Bentler, R. Fabry, D. Hawkins, D. Experts explore some practical issues in hearing aid selection and fitting. The Hearing Journal, 1992, 45, 8: 18-26. 97. MUELLER, HG. A practical guide to today’s bonanza of underused high-tech hearing products. The Hearing Journal, 1993, 46, 3: 14-22. 98. Killion, M. MUELLER, HG. Pavlovic, C. Humes, L. A is for audibility. The Hearing Journal, 1993,46, 4. 99. MUELLER, HG. Bentler, RA. Measurements of TD: How loud is allowed? The Hearing Journal, 1994, 47, 1: 10, 42-46. 100. MUELLER, HG. Getting ready for the IHAFF protocol. The Hearing Journal, 1994, 47, 6: 10, 46-49. 101. MUELLER, HG. Small can be good too! The Hearing Journal, 1994, 47, 11: 11-12. 102. MUELLER, HG. CIC hearing aids: What is their impact on the occlusion effect? The Hearing Journal, 1994, 47, 11: 29-35. 103. MUELLER, HG. Probe-microphone measurements: Unplugged. The Hearing Journal, 1995, 48, 1: 10-12, 34-36. 104. MUELLER, HG. Strouse, AL. Survey shows that user judgment remains dispensers’ favorite fitting procedure. The Hearing Journal, 1995, 48, 10: 25-31. 105. Powers, TA. MUELLER, HG. CIC hearing aids. Hearing Instruments, 1995, 46, 11: 9-10. 106. MUELLER, HG. Do hearing aids work in noise? A simple question with no easy answer. The Hearing Journal, 1995, 48, 4: 13-27. 107. MUELLER, HG. The best of ‘95 in hearing aids.
The Hearing Journal. 1995, 48, 11: 108. MUELLER, HG. Holland, SA. Ebinger, KA. The CIC: More than just another pretty hearing aid! Audiology Today, 7, 5: 19-20. 109. Powers, TA. MUELLER, HG. Patient rejection of CIC hearing aids. Hearing Instruments, 1995, 46, 12: 33-34. 110. MUELLER, HG. Killion, MC. http://www.compression.edu. The Hearing Journal, 1996, 49, 1: 10, 44-48. 111. MUELLER, HG. Hearing aids and people: Strategies for a successful match. The Hearing Journal, 1996, 49, 4: 13-28. 112. Ebinger, KA. MUELLER, HG. Holland, SA, Holland, JW. Assessing the speech-understanding benefit from CIC hearing aids. The Hearing Journal, 1996, 49, 6: 35-42. 113. MUELLER, HG. Ebinger, KE. CIC hearing aids: Potential benefits and fitting strategies. Seminars in Hearing, 1996, 17, 1: 61-80. 114. MUELLER, HG. Bright, KE. Northern, JL. Studies of the hearing aid occlusion effect. Seminars in Hearing, 1996, 17, 1: 21-32. 115. MUELLER, HG. The best in hearing aid articles. The Hearing Journal, 1997, 50, 4 (Suppl. 1): 5-8. 116. Chasin, M. Pirzanski, C. Hayes, D. MUELLER, HG. Real ear occluded gain as a clinical predictor. Hearing Review, 1997, 4, 4: 22-26. 117. MUELLER, HG. Prescriptive fitting methods: The next generation. The Hearing Journal, 1997, 50, 1: 10-19. 118. MUELLER, HG. Outcome measures: The truth about your hearing aid fittings. The Hearing Journal, 1997, 50, 4: 21-33. 119. MUELLER, HG. Palmer, CV. The profile of aided loudness: A new “PAL” for ‘98. The Hearing Journal, 1998, 51, 1: 10-17. 120. MUELLER, HG. Probe-microphone measurements: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. The Hearing Journal, 1998, 51, 4: 17-22. 121. MUELLER, HG. The best of audiology ‘97: hearing aids. The Hearing Journal, 1998, 51, 5: 58-60. 122. MUELLER, HG. Wesselkamp, M. Ten commonly asked questions
concerning the fitting of directional microphone hearing aids. Hearing
Review, 1999 (Supplement). 123. MUELLER, HG. Just make it audible, comfortable and loud, but okay. The Hearing Journal, 1999, 52, 1: 10-17. 124. Ricketts, T. MUELLER, HG. Making sense of directional microphone hearing aids. American Journal of Audiology, 1999. 125. MUELLER,HG. Experts debate key fitting issues. The
Hearing Journal, 1999, 52, 10: 126. MUELLER, HG. The best of audiology ‘98: hearing aids. The Hearing Journal, 1999, 52, 5: 60-64. 127. MUELLER,HG, Ricketts T. Directional microphone hearing aids. The Hearing Journal, 2000, 53, 5: 10-19. 128. Ricketts, T. MUELLER,HG. Prediction of directional hearing aid benefit for individual listeners. Journal of American Academy of Audiology, 2000, 11 (10): 561-569 129. MUELLER,HG. Yes Page Ten is Y2K Compatible. The Hearing
Journal, 2000, 52, 5: 130. MUELLER,HG. What’s the digital difference when it comes to patient benefit? The Hearing Journal, 2000, 53, 3: 23-32. 131. MUELLER, HG. The best of audiology ‘99: hearing aids. The Hearing Journal, 2000, 53, 5: 81-84. 132. MUELLER, HG. Ask the expert: Using probe-mics to measure directionality. Audiology Online, 2001 (Jan) 133. MUELLER,HG. Probe-microphone assessment of digital hearing aids The Hearing Journal, 2001, 54, 1:10-17. 134. MUELLER,HG. Ask the expert: Directionality and WDRC. Audiology Online, 2001 (Feb) 135. MUELLER,HG. Speech audiometry and hearing aids The Hearing Journal, 2001, 54, 10: 68-73. 136. MUELLER, HG. Probe-microphone measurements: 20 years of progress. Trends In Amplification, 2001, 5 (2) 3-39. 137. MUELLER, HG. The best of audiology ‘00: hearing aids. The Hearing Journal, 2001, 54, 4: 68-73. 138. MUELLER, HG. Powers TA. Considerations of auditory acclimatization in the prescriptive fitting of hearing aids. Seminars in Hearing 2001, 22: 103-124. 139. MUELLER,HG. Ask the expert: Transcranial CROS update. Audiology Online, 2002 (Sept) 140. MUELLER, HG, Bentler, RA. How loud is allowed. The Hearing Journal, 2002,55, 1: 10-18. 141. MUELLER, HG. The best of audiology ‘01: hearing aids. The Hearing Journal, 2002, 55, 5: 60-64. 142. MUELLER, HG. A candid round-table discussion on modern digital hearing aids and their features. The Hearing Journal, 2002, 55, 10: 23-35.
143. MUELLER, HG. Evaluation of central auditory function: Monosyllabic procedures. In Handbook of Clinical Audiology (3rd Ed.). Katz. J. (Ed.) Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1985, 355-382. 144. MUELLER, HG. Sedge, R. Salazar, A. Auditory assessment of neural trauma. In Neural Trauma. Miner M., Wagner, K. (Eds.), Stoneham MA: Butterworth Publishers, 1985, 155-188. 145. MUELLER, HG. Grimes, A. Amplification systems for the hearing impaired. In Handbook of Aural Rehabilitation (3rd Ed.). Alpiner, J. McCarthy, P. (Eds.) Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins. 1986, 115-160. 146. Davies, J. MUELLER, HG. Hearing aid selection. In Communication Disorders in Aging. Mueller, HG. Geoffrey, V. (Eds.) Washington, DC: Gallaudet Press. 1987, 408-436. 147. MUELLER, HG. Hawkins, D. Considerations in hearing aid selection. In Clinical Considerations in Hearing Aid Selection. Sandlin, R. (Ed.) San Diego: College Hill Press. 1990, 31-60. 148. MUELLER, HG. Bryant, M. Brown, W. Budinger, A. Hearing aid selection for high frequency hearing loss. In The Vanderbilt Hearing Aid Report II. Studebaker, G. Bess, F. Beck, L. (Eds.). Parkton, MD: York Press, Inc., 1991, 269-286. 149. Hawkins, D. Beck, L. Bratt, G. Fabry, D. MUELLER, HG. Stelmachowicz, P. The Vanderbilt/Department of Veterans Affairs 1990 Conference Consensus Statement: Recommended components of a hearing aid selection procedure for adults. In The Vanderbilt Hearing Aid Report II. Studebaker, G. Bess, F. Beck, L. (Eds.). Parkton, MD: York Press, Inc., 1991, 321-323. 150. MUELLER, HG. Terminology and procedures. In Probe Microphone Measurements: Hearing Aid Selection and Assessment. Mueller, HG. Hawkins, D. Northern , J. (Eds.). San Diego: Singular Press, 1992, 41-67. 151. Hawkins, D. MUELLER, HG. Procedural considerations in probe-microphone measurements. In Probe Microphone Measurements: Hearing Aid Selection and Assessment. Mueller, HG, Hawkins, D. Northern, J. (Eds.). San Diego: Singular Press, 1992, 67-91. 152. MUELLER, HG. Insertion gain measurements. In Probe Microphone Measurements: Hearing Aid Selection and Assessment. Mueller, HG. Hawkins, D. Northern, J. (Eds.). San Diego: Singular Press, 1992, 113-145. 153. MUELLER, HG. Individualizing the ordering of custom hearing aids. In Probe Microphone Measurements: Hearing Aid Selection and Assessment. Mueller, HG. Hawkins, D. Northern, J. (Eds.). San Diego: Singular Press, 1992, 183-201. 154. MUELLER, HG. Hawkins, D. Assessment of fitting arrangements, special circuitry, and features. Probe Microphone Measurements: Hearing Aid Selection and Assessment. Mueller, HG. Hawkins, D. Northern , J. (Eds.). San Diego: Singular Press, 1992, 201-227. 155. MUELLER, HG. Assessment of telecoils and assistive listening devices. Probe Microphone Measurements: Hearing Aid Selection and Assessment. Mueller, HG. Hawkins, D. Northern, J. (Eds.). San Diego: Singular Press, 1992, 227-251. 156. Hawkins, D. MUELLER, HG. Test protocols for probe-microphone measurements. In Probe Microphone Measurements: Hearing Aid Selection and Assessment. Mueller, HG. Hawkins, D. Northern, J. (Eds.). San Diego: Singular Press, 1992, 269-279. 157. MUELLER, HG. Bright, K. Evaluation of central auditory dysfunction using monosyllabic materials. In Handbook of Clinical Audiology (4th Ed.). Katz, J. (Ed.) Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins. 1993, 222-238. 158. MUELLER, HG. Grimes, A. Hearing aid selection. In Handbook of Aural Rehabilitation (3rd Ed.). McCarthy, P. Alpiner, J. (Ed.) Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1993. 159. MUELLER, HG. Bright, K. Selection of hearing aid maximum output. In Hearing Aid Handbook. Valente, M. (Ed.) New York: Thieme, 1993, 38-63. 160. MUELLER, HG. Ebinger, KA. Verification of the performance of CIC instruments. In CIC Handbook. Chasin, M. (Ed.) San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, 1997, 101-126. 161. MUELLER, HG. Strause, A. Hearing aid selection. In Audiologic Rehabilitation. Schow, R. Nerbonne, M. (Eds) Boston: Alynn and Bacon. 1996. 162. MUELLER, HG. The process of hearing loss. In Hearing Loss and Hearing Aids. Carmen, R. (Ed.) Sedona AZ: Auricle Ink Publishers, 1998, 43-64. 163. Palmer, CV. MUELLER, HG. Selection and fitting of hearing aids. In Handbook of Aural Rehabilitation (4th Ed.). McCarthy, P. Alpiner, J. (Ed.) Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins. 2001. 164. MUELLER, HG. Hornsby, B Selection, verification and validation of maximum output. In Strategies for selecting and verifying hearing aid fittings. Valente, M. (Ed.) New York: Thieme, 2002, 23-66 165. MUELLER, HG. Strause, A. Hearing aids and assistive devices. In Audiologic Rehabilitation. (4th Ed.) Schow, R. Nerbonne, M. (Eds) Boston: Alynn and Bacon. 2002, 31-79.
167. MUELLER, HG. Geofrey, V. Communication disorders and aging. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet Press, 1986. 168. MUELLER, HG. Hawkins, DB. Northern, JL. Probe microphone measurements. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, 1992. 169. Hall, JW. MUELLER, HG. The audiologists’ desk reference, Volume I. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, 1997. 170. MUELLER, HG. Hall, JW. The audiologists’ desk reference, Volume II. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, 1998.
gusmueller.net © 2003 |
